Skip to content

Clinic software index · 12 platforms · checked 2026-10-29

Best Med Spa Software, Scored on What Each Platform Publishes

Weighted for a med spa: aesthetic charting, memberships and packages, and booking count for more, and weight-loss tooling for less. Only platforms whose own positioning includes med spas are ranked here.

Mangomint ranks first at 4.8 out of 5, ahead of Jane (4.7) and OptiMantra (4.7).

  1. #1

    Mangomint

    4.8

    Salon, spa and med spa management software

    From $120 a month per location · 95% evidenced

    Read the Mangomint review
  2. #2

    Jane

    4.7

    EMR and practice management software

    From $59 a month · 100% evidenced

    Read the Jane review
  3. #3

    OptiMantra

    4.7

    Specialty EMR and practice management

    From $99 a month · 100% evidenced

    Read the OptiMantra review

The full ranking

  1. #1MangomintSalon, spa and med spa management softwareMed spasFrom $120 a month per location4.8
  2. #2JaneEMR and practice management softwareMed spasFrom $59 a month4.7
  3. #3OptiMantraSpecialty EMR and practice managementMed spasWeight-loss clinicsFrom $99 a month4.7
  4. #4BoulevardMed spa booking and practice management platformMed spasFrom $199 a month for 1 location4.4
  5. #5Aesthetic RecordAesthetic EMR and practice managementMed spasFrom $15 per user a month4.3
  6. #6ZenotiMed spa practice management with built-in EMRMed spasWeight-loss clinicsPricing on request4.3
  7. #7AestheticsProMed spa practice management and EMRMed spasFrom $160 a month4.2
  8. #8PabauClinic practice management and EMRMed spasWeight-loss clinicsPricing on request4.2
  9. #9PatientNowAesthetic practice management and EMRMed spasWeight-loss clinicsPricing on request4.2
  10. #10ProspyrMed spa and aesthetic practice management platformMed spasWeight-loss clinicsPricing on request4.0
  11. #11NextechSpecialty EHR and practice management for aestheticsMed spasPricing on request3.8
  12. #12Akute HealthAutomation-first EHR for cash-based practicesMed spasWeight-loss clinicsFrom $300 a month3.6

Every criterion, every platform

Scores out of 5, counted from each vendor’s own pages. A dash means the vendor publishes nothing on that criterion, so it is left out of that vendor’s average rather than scored low.

PlatformCharting25%Weight loss5%Pricing20%Payments15%Engagement15%Compliance10%Onboarding10%
Mangomint5–55535
Jane5155545
OptiMantra5354545
Boulevard5235554
Aesthetic Record5235535
Zenoti5425554
AestheticsPro4245544
Pabau5525544
PatientNow5525544
Prospyr5515544
Nextech5215543
Akute Health3333554

How this index scores clinic software

Seven criteria, each scored by counting what a vendor’s own public pages evidence, so anyone can recount a score. Three published weightings rank the same evidence for different clinics.

CriterionAll clinicsMed spasWeight-loss clinics
Clinical and aesthetic charting15%25%10%
Weight-loss and GLP-1 programme tools15%5%25%
Pricing transparency20%20%20%
Payments, memberships and packages10%15%10%
Booking and patient engagement10%15%10%
Compliance and security20%10%15%
Onboarding and support10%10%10%
  • All clinics: core criteria Clinical and aesthetic charting; Weight-loss and GLP-1 programme tools. A platform that publishes nothing on a core criterion scores 1 on it in this ranking, rather than having it left out.
  • Med spas: core criterion Clinical and aesthetic charting. A platform that publishes nothing on a core criterion scores 1 on it in this ranking, rather than having it left out.
  • Weight-loss clinics: core criterion Weight-loss and GLP-1 programme tools. A platform that publishes nothing on a core criterion scores 1 on it in this ranking, rather than having it left out.

Clinical and aesthetic charting

The clinical record a med spa or clinic keeps, as the platform describes it: treatment charting, photos, consents and product tracking.

  • Injectable, face or body charting that maps units or treatment areas
  • Before and after photo capture or management
  • Digital consent forms
  • Product lot, batch or inventory tracking

All 4 items published scores 5, 3 scores 4, 2 scores 3 and 1 scores 2. A platform that says it does not chart scores 1. Not mentioned at all: not scored.

Weight-loss and GLP-1 programme tools

What a weight-loss or GLP-1 clinic needs beyond a calendar: prescribing, progress tracking, programme tooling and the lab or pharmacy connection.

  • E-prescribing
  • Weight or body-composition tracking, or remote progress check-ins (general telehealth visits do not count)
  • Weight-loss or GLP-1 programme, protocol or subscription tooling
  • Lab ordering and results, or a pharmacy integration

All 4 items published scores 5, 3 scores 4, 2 scores 3 and 1 scores 2. A platform that says it does not offer these scores 1. Not mentioned at all: not scored.

Pricing transparency

Whether a clinic can see what the software costs before booking a demo. Always scored: publishing no price is the finding, not a gap in the evidence.

  • Every plan has a published price
  • Payment processing rates are published
  • A starting price, or some plans, are priced
  • A pricing page describes the plans without figures

Every plan priced and processing rates published scores 5; every plan priced scores 4; a starting price or some plans priced scores 3; plans described without figures scores 2; no pricing at all scores 1.

Payments, memberships and packages

How the platform takes money: payments, recurring memberships, packages and deposits.

  • Integrated card payments or point of sale
  • Memberships or recurring subscriptions
  • Packages, prepaid series or gift cards
  • Deposits, cancellation fees or patient financing

All 4 items published scores 5, 3 scores 4, 2 scores 3 and 1 scores 2. Not mentioned at all: not scored.

Booking and patient engagement

How patients book, are reminded and stay in touch.

  • Online self-booking
  • Automated appointment reminders
  • Two-way texting or messaging
  • A patient portal or patient app
  • Marketing automation, reviews or loyalty

4 or 5 items published scores 5, 3 scores 4, 2 scores 3 and 1 scores 2. Not mentioned at all: not scored.

Compliance and security

What the vendor states about protecting patient data and controlled-substance prescribing. A claim counts only in the words the vendor uses: "HIPAA-compliant" is not the same as signing a BAA.

  • States HIPAA compliance
  • States it signs a business associate agreement (BAA)
  • States support for controlled-substance e-prescribing (EPCS)
  • States SOC 2, HITRUST or ISO 27001

All 4 items published scores 5, 3 scores 4, 2 scores 3 and 1 scores 2. Not mentioned at all: not scored.

Onboarding and support

How a clinic gets started and gets help.

  • Free trial or self-serve signup
  • Data migration or import offered
  • Onboarding or training included
  • Support channels or hours published

All 4 items published scores 5, 3 scores 4, 2 scores 3 and 1 scores 2. Not mentioned at all: not scored.

Questions clinics ask

What is the best med spa software?

On what each vendor publishes, Mangomint scores highest under the med spas weighting, at 4.8 out of 5, followed by Jane (4.7) and OptiMantra (4.7). Each score counts published features, pricing and compliance statements, and every review shows the evidence behind it.

Which clinic software publishes its pricing?

Mangomint, Jane, OptiMantra and AestheticsPro publish a price for every plan. Boulevard, Aesthetic Record and Akute Health publish a starting price or some plan prices. 2 of the 12 platforms ranked here publish no pricing at all, so a clinic sees a price only after a demo or a quote.

Which platforms say they sign a BAA?

Mangomint, Jane, OptiMantra, Boulevard, Zenoti, Pabau, PatientNow, Prospyr, Nextech and Akute Health state on their own pages that they sign a business associate agreement. A HIPAA claim and a signed BAA are different things, so this index counts them separately.

Which clinic software includes e-prescribing?

OptiMantra, Boulevard, Aesthetic Record, Zenoti, AestheticsPro, Pabau, PatientNow, Prospyr, Nextech and Akute Health publish e-prescribing. Check each review for whether controlled-substance (EPCS) certification is also stated.

How are these scores calculated?

Each platform is scored on 7 criteria by counting what its own public pages evidence, such as a published price for every plan or a stated BAA. Criteria a vendor says nothing about are left out of its average, with two exceptions: publishing no pricing scores 1, and so does publishing nothing on a criterion this ranking treats as core (Clinical and aesthetic charting). The weights for this ranking are printed below, and the same arithmetic scores the sourcing platform index.

Clinic Partner Guide has no commercial relationship with any vendor in this index. None paid to be included, and none saw its scores before they were published. Every score was read from the vendor’s own public pages on the date shown on its review. Third-party review sites are not used as evidence.